A register nobody works is just a longer document.

Extraction is the easy half. A thousand cited obligations nobody reviews is a report that gets filed. Your team needs to work the list down and see what is left.

Which obligations have we dealt with, and what proves it?

Used by project executives, commercial directors and project controls.

DFW Data Center 1 — Review Progress (illustrative)
Week 3
52%
Reviewed
52 of 100 obligations
Accepted40
Corrected10
Rejected2
Unreviewed48

Filter to the items nobody has looked at, or to everything with insufficient evidence, and your team has its work list for the week.

How an item moves

Every obligation carries two states, not one.

Confirming what came out of the documents is one job. Deciding whether the project can show it did the thing is another. The second is where the proof gap lives: everybody agrees the work happened, but can you show why, who directed it and what it changed?

Review state

Did a person confirm what came out of the documents?

UnreviewedAcceptedCorrectedRejected
Compliance assessment

Can the job show it actually did the thing?

Not assessedInsufficient evidenceCompliantNon-compliant

Insufficient evidence is not non-compliant. One says the paperwork is not in front of you. The other says the job failed. Your team should never be forced to record the second when it means the first.

One item, worked

Evidence matched against a stated test.

The obligation states what would prove it before anyone goes looking. Your reviewer attaches what exists, and the gap names itself rather than being argued about six months later.

§50-17
Corrected
What the contract requires

Notify the Engineer in writing of the intention to claim additional compensation within ten (10) calendar days.

GENERAL PROVISIONS › 50-17 › GP-23

What would prove it

A written notice to the Engineer, dated within 10 calendar days of the event, and sent before the claimed work began.

Evidence on file
Daily report: condition first recognised03 Jun 2026
Photographs of the condition03 Jun 2026
Written notice of intention to claimNot on file
AssessmentInsufficient evidenceNot the same as non-compliant.
When the documents change

An addendum should not cost you three weeks.

This is the thing that decides whether a register survives contact with a live job. Nobody reviews a thousand items twice.

22 Mar
Rev A reviewed

Your team works through the register over three weeks, accepting and correcting as it goes.

04 Apr
Addendum 3 arrives

Eleven specification sections are reissued. The package has to be read again.

04 Apr
Rev B extracted

Items touched by the addendum are flagged stale for re-review. Every other decision your team made stands.

Where we stop

Your judgement stays in the record.

You decide what counts as enough

Halozen states the test and shows what is filed against it. Whether that satisfies you is your call.

You keep your team's judgement

A re-extraction flags earlier reviews as stale. It never silently overwrites one.

You can check every item

Each obligation carries the document, section and page it came from, so nothing has to be taken on trust.

No citation, no output.

Review & Evidence

Put one project
under review.

Start with a job where nobody has time to read everything twice. Your team gets the register, the tests and the work list.

No implementation. Start with the records you already have.